English
The World Economic Forum's Global Risks Report 2026 has ranked geoeconomic confrontation as the top immediate global risk for the first time, and the weaponization of critical minerals supply chains has emerged as its most tangible manifestation. As the United States, China, and the European Union vie for control over lithium, rare earths, cobalt, and graphite, these resources are no longer just industrial inputs but strategic levers reshaping alliances, industrial policy, and global trade. With China controlling over 90% of rare earth processing and deploying export controls that have sent prices soaring, the scramble for critical minerals has become the new frontline of 2026.
China's Dominance and the Weaponization of Supply Chains
China's stranglehold on critical mineral processing is unprecedented. The country accounts for roughly 70% of global rare earth production and close to 90% of refining and processing capacity, giving Beijing effective control over materials essential for electric vehicles, wind turbines, semiconductors, and defense systems. In April 2025, China imposed export licensing controls on seven heavy rare earth elements, triggering severe disruptions across allied supply chains. Dysprosium prices nearly doubled to $189/kg, and by early 2026, the metal had surged to over $930/kg — a 208% increase over the past decade. The rare earth supply chain crisis has become a defining feature of the new geopolitical landscape.
China's Notice No. 61, published in late 2025, introduced extraterritorial jurisdiction including a re-export rule and a 0.1% de minimis threshold on Chinese-origin rare earth content. High-risk end uses like military applications and sub-14nm semiconductor fabrication face effective bans. Neodymium-praseodymium prices surged 89% year-on-year, and up to $6.5 trillion of economic activity outside China could be at risk. A temporary suspension until November 10, 2026, offers a narrow window for Western nations to diversify, but current efforts in mining, processing, and recycling remain insufficient. Less than 5% of rare earths are currently recycled despite over 90% technical potential.
The US Response: Project Vault and the Critical Minerals Ministerial
On February 4, 2026, the U.S. Department of State hosted the 2026 Critical Minerals Ministerial, led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance, with representatives from 54 countries and the European Commission. The event aimed to reshape the global critical minerals market to reduce concentration risks and political coercion. Key outcomes included 11 new bilateral critical minerals frameworks or MOUs with countries including Argentina, Morocco, the UAE, and the United Kingdom. The centerpiece was the creation of FORGE (Forum on Resource Geostrategic Engagement) as the successor to the Minerals Security Partnership, chaired by the Republic of Korea.
The U.S. mobilized over $30 billion in government financing for critical mineral projects, including EXIM's Project Vault — a $10 billion domestic strategic reserve for critical minerals, the largest financing in EXIM's history. A private sector summit also advanced industry partnerships, including a Glencore-Orion MOU for investments in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Despite these efforts, the U.S. still imports 90% of its rare earth needs from China, and non-Chinese producers like Lynas Rare Earths and MP Materials face significant operational, regulatory, and financial hurdles in scaling up mine-to-magnet supply chains. The US critical minerals strategy is racing against time to reduce dependency.
The EU's Strategic Projects and the ReSourceEU Action Plan
The European Union has not stood still. Under the Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA), the European Commission officially approved 60 Strategic Projects on March 25, 2025, covering extraction, processing, recycling, and substitution activities across 14 critical raw materials including lithium, cobalt, rare earths, and graphite. In December 2025, the Commission adopted the 'ReSourceEU' Action Plan, allocating up to €3 billion ($3.5 billion) in 2026 to secure critical raw materials supply.
Key measures include regulatory fast-tracking for strategic projects, €250 million from the European Investment Bank for Vulcan Energy's lithium project in Germany, and support for Greenland Resources' molybdenum mine. A new European Critical Raw Materials Centre, modelled on Japan's JOGMEC, will be established in early 2026 to finance projects, generate market intelligence, and manage joint purchasing and stockpiling. The Commission also plans to tighten safeguards against foreign interference, introduce export restrictions on permanent magnet scrap to boost recycling, and propose export duties on aluminium and copper scrap by spring 2026. International partnerships with resource-rich countries like Brazil, Canada, Ukraine, and the Western Balkans are being pursued to diversify supply chains. However, the EU Critical Raw Materials Act implementation faces significant financing gaps, with current volumes far below diversification needs.
Real-World Impacts: Ford Halts Production
The weaponization of mineral supply chains has already produced real-world casualties. In early 2025, Ford Motor Co. halted production at multiple factories, including its Chicago plant, due to a critical shortage of rare earth magnets caused by China's retaliatory export restrictions. Dysprosium was trading at ~$1,125/kg and terbium at ~$4,500/kg in Western spot markets, representing massive premiums over Chinese domestic prices. The shutdown lasted three weeks and marked a shift from theoretical geopolitical risk to a direct constraint on industrial output. McKinsey projects rare earth magnet demand could triple from 59,000 to 186,000 metric tons by 2035, driven by EVs, wind turbines, and industrial automation, suggesting the crisis is only beginning.
Expert Perspectives and the Path Forward
"Geoeconomic confrontation has overtaken armed conflict as the most immediate global risk, and critical minerals are its most strategically consequential arena," said Saadia Zahidi, Managing Director of the World Economic Forum. "The retreat from multilateralism is forcing nations to choose between costly independence and managed dependence."
Analysts at the ODI note that China's 15th Five-Year Plan will reinforce its dominance — by 2035, China is projected to supply over 60% of refined lithium and cobalt, and ~80% of battery-grade graphite and rare earths. Emerging players like the UAE and Saudi Arabia are entering the market, increasing competitive pressure on Western efforts. A multi-institutional analysis warns of a narrowing 12-18 month window for Western nations to act decisively, presenting three strategic paths: managed dependence, costly independence, or a hybrid resilience model combining stockpiles, alternative sources, and recycling. The geopolitical risks of critical minerals are forcing businesses to restructure procurement strategies along geopolitical blocs.
FAQ
What are critical minerals?
Critical minerals, also known as critical raw materials, are raw materials designated by governments as essential for national economies and security due to their economic importance and vulnerable supply chains. They include rare earth elements, lithium, cobalt, graphite, and others vital for green technologies, defense, and electronics.
Why does China dominate critical mineral processing?
China has invested billions since the 1980s in subsidies, strategic planning, and infrastructure for rare earth and critical mineral processing. It now controls over 90% of global rare earth refining capacity and ~70% of production, giving it effective leverage over global supply chains.
What is Project Vault?
Project Vault is a $10 billion initiative by the U.S. Export-Import Bank (EXIM) to establish a Strategic Critical Minerals Reserve, announced at the 2026 Critical Minerals Ministerial. It is the largest single financing in EXIM's history and aims to reduce U.S. dependence on Chinese supply.
How is the EU responding to critical mineral dependency?
The EU has adopted the Critical Raw Materials Act, selected 60 Strategic Projects, and launched the ReSourceEU Action Plan with €3 billion in funding for 2026. It is also establishing a European Critical Raw Materials Centre to coordinate joint purchasing, stockpiling, and market intelligence.
What does the 2026 Global Risks Report say about geoeconomic confrontation?
The World Economic Forum's Global Risks Report 2026 ranks geoeconomic confrontation as the top short-term risk, with 50% of surveyed leaders expecting a turbulent world over the next two years. The weaponization of supply chains, tariffs, and resource competition are key drivers.
Conclusion
The weaponization of critical mineral supply chains has redrawn the map of global competition. With China's dominance unlikely to erode quickly, the U.S. and EU are racing to build alternative capacity through massive investments, strategic partnerships, and new institutions like FORGE and the European Critical Raw Materials Centre. The coming 12-18 months will be decisive: if Western nations fail to secure diversified supply chains, the geoeconomic confrontation of 2026 may deepen into a permanent structural dependency with profound implications for national security, industrial competitiveness, and the energy transition. The future of critical mineral supply chains will determine the balance of economic power for decades to come.
Follow Discussion