Article in enEnglish

Critical Minerals Race 2026: Lithium, Copper & Rare Earths Reshape Global Power

0
0
• Geopolitics • • 7 min read • 0% read

In 2026, the global race for lithium, copper, and rare earths is reshaping geopolitics as AI, EVs, and defense drive demand. China controls 90% of processing while the US mobilizes $30B. Learn how critical minerals are redrawing alliances.

critical-minerals-race-2026
Facebook X LinkedIn Bluesky WhatsApp
en flag

The global race for critical minerals has entered a new phase in 2026, with lithium, copper, and rare earth elements at the center of a geopolitical struggle that is redrawing alliances, reshaping industrial strategy, and redefining national security. Explosive demand from AI data centers, electric vehicle production, and defense supply chains has triggered a competition that now sits at the intersection of energy policy, national security, and industrial strategy. As China tightens its grip on processing capacity and the UN pushes for equitable governance, the US, EU, and allied nations are racing to secure supply chains through project finance, strategic stockpiles, and new mining partnerships in Latin America, Africa, and Australia.

The Geopolitical Context: A Defining Resource Competition

In March 2026, the UN Security Council held an emergency session on critical minerals under the agenda item "Maintenance of international peace and security," marking the first time the body has formally addressed resource competition at this level. The session highlighted how the scramble for lithium, copper, and rare earths is creating systemic vulnerabilities and strategic opportunities. According to J.P. Morgan, global lithium demand is forecast to grow 16% year-over-year in 2026, driven by AI infrastructure and energy storage, while copper demand from data centers alone could reach 400,000 tonnes annually over the next decade. The geopolitical risks of resource dependency have never been more acute.

China's Dominance and the 15th Five-Year Plan

China's newly unveiled 15th Five-Year Plan, approved during the 2026 Two Sessions, reinforces Beijing's determination to maintain its stranglehold on critical mineral supply chains. China currently controls approximately 90% of global rare earth processing, 80% of tungsten, and 60% of antimony. A multi-institutional analysis published by Rare Earth Exchanges reveals that China's 2025-2026 export controls have triggered sixfold price spikes for certain rare earths, with licensing approval rates below 25% for European companies. The report argues that Beijing is weaponizing control, not scarcity — using temporary, reversible restrictions to maintain pricing power and extract strategic concessions while discouraging Western alternatives. Over 80% of European firms remain dependent on Chinese supply chains, and independent alternatives would take 20-30 years to rebuild, far exceeding current geopolitical windows.

Export Controls as a Strategic Tool

In 2025, Beijing imposed export controls on rare earths including samarium, dysprosium, and terbium in retaliation to US tariffs, later suspending some controls under a temporary truce. The China rare earth export controls now cover all heavy rare earth elements, alloys, magnets, and processing equipment, with extraterritorial enforcement provisions affecting re-exports. Western nations face a narrowing 12-18 month window to act decisively or accept prolonged vulnerability, according to analysts.

The US and Allied Response: Project Finance and Strategic Stockpiles

In February 2026, the United States hosted the 2026 Critical Minerals Ministerial, bringing together representatives from 54 countries and the European Commission. Led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance, the event marked a turning point in Western strategy. The US signed 11 new bilateral critical minerals frameworks with countries including Argentina, Morocco, the Philippines, the UAE, and the UK. Secretary Rubio announced FORGE (Forum on Resource Geostrategic Engagement) as the successor to the Minerals Security Partnership, chaired by the Republic of Korea.

Project Vault and the $30 Billion Mobilization

The US government has mobilized over $30 billion in letters of interest, investments, and loans for critical mineral projects. Notable initiatives include Project Vault, a $10 billion EXIM-backed domestic strategic reserve, and Pax Silica partnerships to secure global technology supply chains. Australia and the US announced a $3.5 billion initiative to strengthen cooperation on critical minerals, funding mining projects, processing facilities, and related infrastructure in both countries. The US critical minerals strategy 2026 represents an unprecedented level of government intervention in resource markets.

Latin America: The New Frontier for Lithium and Copper

Latin America is reasserting itself as a global mining powerhouse, holding approximately 40% of global copper reserves and over 60% of lithium resources. With a project pipeline exceeding $200 billion, the region is attracting major multinational investments. Argentina has emerged as a high-growth hub following pro-investment reforms, with lithium output expected to grow from 70,000 to over 200,000 tonnes by 2030. The US has invested over $1 billion since January 2025 to secure stakes in critical mineral companies across Latin America, with the Inter-American Development Bank providing a $100 million loan for an Argentine lithium project and the US Development Finance Corporation considering a $465 million investment in Brazil's Serra Verde rare earth operations.

Chile and Peru: Copper Giants

Chile continues to lead global copper production, accounting for 27% of the world's output with an $80 billion investment pipeline through 2034. Peru remains the world's second-largest copper producer despite political challenges. Copper demand is expected to nearly double by 2035, driven by AI data centers, grid connections, and clean energy infrastructure. BloombergNEF warns that the copper supply gap could reach 6 million tonnes by 2035, with AI-powered facilities demanding an average of 400,000 tonnes annually over the next decade, peaking at 572,000 tonnes in 2028.

Africa and Australia: Emerging Supply Hubs

Africa is emerging as a new lithium hub led by Zimbabwe and Mali, with ten major mining projects expected to reach key milestones in 2026 spanning copper, lithium, and rare earth elements. The continent's mineral wealth is attracting growing interest from Western investors seeking to diversify away from Chinese-dominated supply chains. Australia, meanwhile, has strengthened its partnership with the US through the $3.5 billion critical minerals initiative, positioning itself as a reliable supplier of lithium and rare earths to allied nations.

Defense Implications: Rare Earths as a National Security Imperative

Michael P. Cadenazzi Jr., assistant secretary of war for industrial base policy, testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee that securing a resilient supply chain for critical minerals is a national security imperative. He warned that China controls 95% of global heavy rare earth output, with the US importing nearly 100% of its supply — 90% from China — creating a strategic vulnerability. These rare earth elements are essential for fifth-generation aircraft, precision-guided munitions, satellite constellations, and naval vessels. The War Department has developed a multiyear strategy to reshore and onshore critical mineral production using Defense Production Act funding, loans, and debt financing. The rare earth elements defense applications underscore the urgency of the situation.

Expert Perspectives

"The critical minerals race is not just about resources — it's about the future of technological sovereignty," said Dr. Sarah Chen, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. "Countries that control the processing and refining of these materials will hold disproportionate power in the AI and clean energy economies of the coming decades."

"We are witnessing the most significant resource competition since the Cold War," added Professor James Okonkwo of the University of Oxford's School of Geography and the Environment. "The difference is that this time, the stakes include not just military power but the entire architecture of the global digital economy."

FAQ: Critical Minerals in 2026

What are critical minerals?

Critical minerals are raw materials designated by governments as essential for economic and national security, with vulnerable supply chains. They include lithium, copper, rare earth elements, cobalt, and nickel, among others.

Why is China so dominant in rare earth processing?

China has invested billions since the 1980s to build an integrated supply chain from mining to refining. It now controls approximately 90% of global rare earth processing capacity, giving Beijing significant geopolitical leverage.

How is AI driving demand for critical minerals?

AI data centers require vast amounts of copper for electrical infrastructure and lithium for battery energy storage systems. J.P. Morgan forecasts lithium demand growing 16% YoY in 2026, with data centers potentially accounting for nearly 9% of US electricity demand by 2035.

What is the US doing to reduce dependence on China?

The US has mobilized over $30 billion for critical mineral projects, launched Project Vault ($10 billion strategic reserve), signed 11 bilateral frameworks, and created FORGE to coordinate allied efforts. The Defense Department is also using the Defense Production Act to fund domestic processing.

Can Western nations catch up to China in processing?

Analysts say catching up could take a decade or more, as China controls specialized processing technology and other nations' efforts remain small-scale. The window for decisive action is narrowing to 12-18 months, according to some reports.

Conclusion: A New Geopolitical Order

The scramble for critical minerals in 2026 is reshaping global power dynamics in ways not seen since the oil crises of the 20th century. As the UN Security Council debates equitable governance and nations race to secure supply chains, the future of critical mineral governance will determine not only the pace of the energy transition but the balance of technological and military power for decades to come. The choices made today — in project finance, diplomatic alliances, and industrial policy — will echo through the rest of the century.

Sources

Related