Judge Overturns White House Media Ban on CNN, Politico

A federal judge overturned the White House media ban on CNN, MS Now and Politico on Sept. 24, 2026, restoring press passes for 14 days. Learn what it means.

Judge Overturns White House Media Ban on CNN, Politico
Share
Share this article Choose a network or an app on your device.
Email

Edition: EN

A federal judge on Thursday ordered President Donald Trump to immediately restore White House access for journalists from CNN, MS Now, and Politico, ruling that last week's White House media ban likely violated the outlets' constitutional due process rights. The 14-day temporary restraining order from U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly requires the administration to 'immediately return, reinstate, and restore' the press credentials that the Secret Service confiscated on September 18, 2026.

What Led to the White House Media Ban?

The three news organizations sued on September 21, 2026, after their journalists were blocked from the White House and had credentials confiscated. The lawsuit named Trump, chief of staff Susie Wiles, communications director Steven Cheung, and Secret Service Director Sean Curran, alleging violations of First Amendment and Fifth Amendment due process rights. The case echoes previous Trump-era conflicts with Trump White House press access disputes over who may cover the president.

Trump responded on Truth Social by saying he was targeting 'FAKE NEWS.' The administration argued that the passes were revoked for security reasons, but Judge Kelly found no evidence to support that claim. 'The record shows no national-security motivation predating the suit,' Kelly wrote, according to court documents.

Why the Judge Rejected the Administration's Defense

National Security Justification Rejected

Judge Kelly, a Trump appointee who also ruled in 2018 to restore CNN reporter Jim Acosta's press badge, rejected the government's national security argument as vague. He noted that when announcing the ban, Trump focused on the outlets' alleged lack of truthfulness and negative reporting rather than security. The judge called the cited stories 'routine' and said nothing in the record supported the administration's stated justification.

Due Process and the Sherrill Precedent

Kelly relied on the 1977 ruling in Sherrill v. Knight, which bars the arbitrary denial of White House press passes based on coverage. The judge said journalists are entitled to due process before press passes can be revoked, and the outlets had no opportunity to appeal the revocation. This decision is part of a broader body of First Amendment press freedom cases that define press access rights.

What the Ruling Means for Press Freedom

The decision is a significant setback for the administration's efforts to control White House press access. In a show of solidarity, major networks including ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox, and NBC issued a rare joint statement and suspended their pooled coverage of Trump events. Even Trump-friendly outlets such as NewsMax struggled to follow the president without the shared pool footage. The ruling could have broader implications for White House press pool solidarity in the run-up to the November 3 midterm elections.

Attorney Ted Boutrous praised the ruling: 'This is a strong ruling vindicating freedom of the press.' The Justice Department said it plans to appeal, though Kelly noted that temporary restraining orders are generally not appealable. Forty-nine organizations filed a brief supporting the outlets.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which outlets were banned from the White House?

CNN, MS Now, and Politico had their press credentials revoked on September 18, 2026, by the Secret Service.

Why did President Trump ban these media outlets?

Trump said he was targeting 'FAKE NEWS' and cited the outlets' alleged lack of truthfulness and negative reporting, according to the judge's ruling.

What did the judge order?

U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly issued a 14-day temporary restraining order requiring the White House to immediately return, reinstate, and restore the press passes.

Can the administration appeal the ruling?

The Justice Department plans to appeal, but temporary restraining orders are generally not appealable. Expedited briefing on a preliminary injunction will follow.

How did other news organizations respond?

Major networks suspended pooled coverage in solidarity, and 49 organizations filed a brief supporting CNN, MS Now, and Politico.

Closely related