English
In a watershed moment for global finance, the mBridge cross-border central bank digital currency (CBDC) platform has processed over $55 billion in transactions by early 2026, marking the first viable large-scale alternative to the SWIFT messaging system and dollar-based clearing. Under India's 2026 BRICS chairship, the platform has become the operational backbone of a rapidly fragmenting international payments architecture, enabling energy exporters like Saudi Arabia and the UAE to settle trades entirely outside Western financial infrastructure.
What is mBridge and Why Does It Matter?
Project mBridge is a blockchain-based wholesale CBDC platform that enables real-time, peer-to-peer cross-border payments and foreign exchange transactions. Developed jointly by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority, the Bank of Thailand, the Central Bank of the UAE, the Digital Currency Research Institute of the People's Bank of China, and the BIS Innovation Hub (with Saudi Arabia joining in June 2024), mBridge uses a distributed ledger called the mBridge Ledger to settle transactions in seconds — compared to one to three days via traditional correspondent banking — at a fraction of the cost. The digital yuan dominance on the platform is striking: the e-CNY accounts for approximately 95% of all settlement volume, according to data from the Atlantic Council's CBDC Tracker.
The platform's growth has been explosive. From a modest $22 million in its 2022 pilot phase, mBridge surged to an estimated $100 billion in annual flows by 2025, and crossed $55.5 billion in cumulative transactions by January 2026, representing a 2,500-fold increase. More than 4,000 cross-border transactions have been executed, with participating central banks now including China, Hong Kong, Thailand, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia.
The Geopolitical Context: Financial Fragmentation Goes Operational
The World Economic Forum's Global Risks Report 2026, released in January, ranks geoeconomic confrontation as the top risk most likely to trigger a global crisis this year. The report warns of a retreat from multilateralism, declining trust, and heightened protectionism — conditions that have created fertile ground for competing financial architectures to emerge. The G20's diminishing relevance is evident as BRICS+ expands to 11 full members (Brazil, China, Egypt, Ethiopia, India, Indonesia, Iran, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, and the UAE) plus 10 partner countries, while the G7 struggles to present a unified economic vision.
India's 2026 BRICS chairship, themed "Building for Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability," has prioritized the operationalization of an "execution-led" economic framework. Central to this is mBridge, which India proposes to link with its own e-Rupee, Brazil's Drex, and Russia's digital ruble, creating a multi-CBDC network spanning the Global South.
The BIS Exit: A Defining Moment
The Bank for International Settlements formally withdrew from mBridge in late 2024, with BIS General Manager Agustín Carstens stating the project had "graduated" to independence. However, reports from the TFTC and other outlets indicate that sanctions compliance concerns were a key factor. Carstens emphasized that mBridge was not created to circumvent sanctions, but the BIS's departure left the platform firmly in the hands of its BRICS+ participants. The BIS has since pivoted to Project Agorá, a rival initiative involving the Federal Reserve, ECB, and Bank of Japan — effectively drawing a line between Western and non-Western CBDC infrastructure.
Energy Trade and the Dollar's Diminishing Role
The most transformative application of mBridge has been in energy trade. Saudi Arabia and the UAE, both full BRICS members, have begun settling oil and gas transactions using the digital yuan via mBridge, bypassing the dollar-denominated petrodollar system that has underpinned global energy markets since the 1970s. China and Saudi Arabia settled their first oil trade using the digital yuan in 2024, a symbolic milestone that has since become operational reality. The petrodollar system shift is accelerating: McKinsey's 2026 trade update confirms that global commerce is fracturing along geopolitical lines, with the US-China trade corridor shrinking by 30% and over $165 billion in trade redirected to alternative corridors.
For energy exporters, mBridge offers a compelling value proposition: transaction times drop from days to seconds, costs fall from 6-8% to near zero, and settlement occurs outside the reach of Western sanctions. The platform's ability to process real-time payment-versus-payment settlement in multiple CBDCs makes it particularly attractive for commodity trades where speed and certainty are paramount.
Implications for Sanctions and Reserve Currency Dynamics
The operationalization of mBridge carries profound implications for the effectiveness of financial sanctions. The US and its allies have long relied on control over SWIFT and dollar clearing to enforce sanctions regimes. With mBridge providing an alternative settlement channel, sanctioned entities — including Russian banks and Iranian oil traders — can potentially access international payments without touching the dollar system. Chinese regulators have already directed banks to use mBridge, and reports indicate the platform has been used by firms operating in Xinjiang to avoid US sanctions related to human rights concerns.
For multinational corporations, the bifurcation of global payments into G7 and BRICS+ spheres creates a strategic dilemma. Companies operating across both blocs must now navigate two increasingly separate financial architectures, each with its own compliance requirements, settlement currencies, and regulatory frameworks. The multinational corporate strategy implications are significant: treasury operations may need to maintain dual liquidity pools, and supply chain financing may require parallel banking relationships.
Expert Perspectives
"mBridge represents the first time a non-Western payment system has achieved scale and operational viability," says Josh Lipsky, Senior Director of the Atlantic Council's GeoEconomics Center. "The $55 billion milestone is not just a number — it signals that the infrastructure for a parallel financial system is now live and functioning. The question is no longer whether fragmentation will happen, but how fast and how deep."
"India's chairship is crucial because New Delhi has the credibility to bridge the gap between China's technological ambitions and the broader BRICS+ membership's desire for a system that doesn't simply replace dollar dominance with yuan dominance," notes a senior official involved in BRICS financial working groups, speaking on condition of anonymity.
FAQ
What is mBridge?
mBridge is a blockchain-based platform for cross-border payments using central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). It enables real-time settlement between participating central banks and commercial banks, bypassing traditional correspondent banking and the SWIFT messaging system.
How much volume has mBridge processed?
As of early 2026, mBridge has processed over $55.5 billion in cumulative transactions, up from $22 million in its 2022 pilot phase — a 2,500-fold increase. The digital yuan accounts for approximately 95% of settlement volume.
Which countries participate in mBridge?
Full participating central banks include China, Hong Kong, Thailand, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia. Under India's BRICS chairship, plans are underway to link India's e-Rupee, Brazil's Drex, and Russia's digital ruble to the platform.
Why did the BIS leave mBridge?
The Bank for International Settlements formally exited in late 2024, citing the project's maturity. However, sanctions compliance concerns were a key factor, as mBridge enables transactions that could circumvent US and EU sanctions. The BIS has since launched Project Agorá with Western central banks.
What does mBridge mean for the US dollar?
mBridge represents the most significant operational challenge to dollar hegemony in decades. By enabling trade settlement in digital yuan and other CBDCs outside the dollar system, it incrementally erodes the dollar's role in global trade and reserves, particularly in Asia-Middle East energy corridors.
Conclusion: The New Financial Geography
The mBridge milestone of $55 billion is more than a technical achievement — it is a geopolitical inflection point. As the WEF Global Risks Report 2026 warns, geoeconomic confrontation is now the top global risk, and the financial architecture is being reshaped in real time. BRICS+ members, projected to average 3.7% economic growth in 2026 versus 1.1% for the G7, have both the incentive and the infrastructure to pursue de-dollarization. For the G20, whose relevance is increasingly questioned, the challenge is whether it can adapt to a multipolar financial order or become a casualty of the very fragmentation it was designed to prevent.
Multinational corporations, policymakers, and investors must now reckon with a world where two distinct payment systems — one dollar-based and Western-led, the other CBDC-based and BRICS+-led — operate in parallel. The future of global payments will be defined not by a single standard, but by the competition between them.
Sources
- Atlantic Council: What to Watch as China Prepares Its Digital Yuan for Prime Time
- WEF Global Risks Report 2026
- India BRICS Chairship 2026 Official Website
- TFTC: BIS Distances Itself from Project mBridge Amid Sanctions Concerns
- Command Eleven: BRICS 2026 Expansion, mBridge, and Global Financial Fragmentation
Follow Discussion