Dutch Privacy Watchdog Urges LinkedIn Users to Opt Out of AI Data Use

Dutch privacy watchdog warns LinkedIn users to opt out of AI data collection by November 3. Default setting allows profile data use for AI training, raising GDPR compliance concerns.

Dutch Privacy Watchdog Urges LinkedIn Users to Opt Out of AI Data Use
Facebook X LinkedIn Bluesky WhatsApp
de flag en flag es flag es flag fr flag nl flag pt flag pt flag

LinkedIn Faces Privacy Backlash Over AI Training Plans

The Dutch Data Protection Authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens) has issued an urgent warning to LinkedIn's 1.7 million Dutch users, urging them to disable a default setting that allows their profile data to be used for artificial intelligence training. The professional networking platform plans to begin using user data for AI development starting November 3, 2025.

Default Opt-In Raises Privacy Concerns

According to the privacy watchdog, LinkedIn has enabled the AI data collection feature by default, meaning all user profiles, including names, photos, posts, and comments dating back to 2003, will automatically be used to train AI systems unless users actively opt out. "LinkedIn wants to use data going back to 2003, while people shared that information back then without foreseeing it would be used for AI training," said AP Vice-Chair Monique Verdier.

How LinkedIn's AI Training Works

The Microsoft-owned platform is developing AI systems that can generate professional content, including LinkedIn's AI-powered writing assistant that helps users draft messages. These systems learn by analyzing vast amounts of existing content to understand patterns and generate similar text. The process, known as "training," requires extensive data to function effectively.

Broader Tech Industry Trend

This move follows similar actions by Meta, which began using Facebook and Instagram user data for AI training in May 2025. The AP has questioned whether this "opt-out" approach complies with European privacy laws like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Regulatory oversight for these platforms falls to Irish authorities since most major tech companies have their European headquarters in Ireland.

How to Protect Your Data

Users who wish to prevent their data from being used for AI training can disable the setting through LinkedIn's privacy preferences or by visiting the dedicated settings page. LinkedIn confirms that private messages are excluded from AI training, and profiles suspected to belong to minors are also protected.

Related

LinkedIn to Use Your Data for AI Training from November 3
Ai
AI relevance 68.7%

LinkedIn to Use Your Data for AI Training from November 3

LinkedIn will automatically use member data from EU, EEA, Switzerland, Canada & Hong Kong to train AI models...

WeTransfer Removes AI Clause After Media Backlash
Ai
AI relevance 39.8%

WeTransfer Removes AI Clause After Media Backlash

WeTransfer removed AI training clauses from its terms after media reports, claiming they never used files for AI....

Meta Tracks Every Keystroke for AI: Employees Outraged
Ai
AI relevance 39.5%

Meta Tracks Every Keystroke for AI: Employees Outraged

Meta tracks every keystroke, mouse movement, and screenshot of US employees under its Model Capability Initiative to...

xAI Exposes 370K Private Grok Conversations in Major Privacy Breach
Ai
AI relevance 35.8%

xAI Exposes 370K Private Grok Conversations in Major Privacy Breach

Elon Musk's xAI exposed over 370,000 private Grok chatbot conversations through a flawed share feature that...

LinkedIn BrowserGate Scandal: Secret Chrome Extension Scanning Explained | Privacy Guide
Technology
AI relevance 34.4%

LinkedIn BrowserGate Scandal: Secret Chrome Extension Scanning Explained | Privacy Guide

LinkedIn secretly scans Chrome browsers for 6,000+ extensions without consent, raising GDPR concerns. Learn about...

OpenAI's Response to The New York Times' Data Demands to Protect User Privacy
Ai
AI relevance 34.2%

OpenAI's Response to The New York Times' Data Demands to Protect User Privacy

OpenAI is opposing The New York Times' demand to retain user data indefinitely, citing privacy concerns and legal overreach.