Dutch creator Eline van der Velden's AI actress Tilly Norwood sparks Hollywood outrage with stars like Emily Blunt and Whoopi Goldberg condemning the creation. SAG-AFTRA warns of contractual violations while the creator defends it as artistic expression.

AI Actress Sparks Hollywood Backlash
The entertainment industry is facing a new technological frontier as Tilly Norwood, an AI-generated actress created by Dutch filmmaker Eline van der Velden, has ignited fierce debate and outrage among Hollywood's elite. The hyperreal digital character, developed through van der Velden's AI production studio Particle6 and its subsidiary Xicoia, has been presented as 'the next Scarlett Johansson or Natalie Portman' according to her creator.
Celebrity Reactions and Industry Concerns
Multiple A-list actors have voiced strong opposition to the AI creation. Emily Blunt, known for her roles in Mary Poppins Returns and The Devil Wears Prada, expressed deep concern during a podcast interview, stating 'Is this AI? God, we're in trouble. This is really, really bad. Come on, talent agencies, please don't do this. Stop taking away human connection.'
Whoopi Goldberg and Natasha Lyonne have joined the chorus of criticism. Lyonne, star of Orange Is the New Black and Russian Doll, called the development 'deeply misleading and totally insane' and demanded that 'any talent agency that deals with this should be boycotted.' Goldberg emphasized the fundamental differences between human performers and synthetic creations, noting audiences can distinguish between genuine human emotion and computer-generated performances.
The Creator's Defense
Eline van der Velden, who has a background as an actress herself with roles in Dutch productions including the VPRO series Beatrix, Oranje onder vuur, defends her creation as artistic expression rather than human replacement. In a LinkedIn post, she explained that Norwood was created using ten different programs including ChatGPT and Runway.
'We hope that we can welcome artificial intelligence as an additional way to express ourselves, alongside theater, film, painting, music and countless other forms,' van der Velden stated. She views AI as 'a creative work and artwork' that can open doors to 'new voices' and compares the creative process to developing a character or role.
SAG-AFTRA's Strong Opposition
The Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA) has taken a firm stance against the AI actress. The union, which recently concluded a historic 118-day strike in 2023 that included significant AI protections, issued a statement declaring that Norwood 'is not an actor; it's a character generated by a computer program that was trained on the work of countless professional artists.'
The union emphasized that the AI creation 'has no life experience to draw from, no emotion. The audience is not interested in watching computer-generated content that is detached from the human experience.' SAG-AFTRA warned that agencies and studios could face contractual issues if they use Norwood, citing the 2023 agreement that established protections against unauthorized use of AI in performances.
Broader Industry Implications
The controversy comes at a critical moment for the entertainment industry, which is still grappling with the aftermath of the 2023 labor strikes. According to BBC reporting, the debate reflects deeper concerns about AI's role in creative fields and its potential impact on employment for human performers.
Van der Velden's Particle6 studio has ambitious plans for Xicoia, aiming to create more than 40 AI personas and expand into scripted entertainment, live performances, and merchandising. However, the strong backlash from both actors and their union suggests significant resistance to this vision of AI-driven entertainment.
As the industry navigates this new technological landscape, the Tilly Norwood controversy highlights the ongoing tension between innovation and tradition, between technological advancement and the preservation of human artistry in entertainment.